Course Contents

The Full C1 Roadmap

10 units · 50 lessons · 10 Review Labs · communication-first across reading, listening, grammar, vocabulary, pronunciation and speaking.

  1. A0/A1Beginner
  2. A1/A2Elementary
  3. A2/B1Pre-Intermediate
  4. B1/B1+Intermediate
  5. B2Upper-Intermediate
  6. C1Advanced
  7. C2Proficiency

Unit 1 · Lessons 0105

Identity, Values & Human Behaviour

What shapes who we are

CEFR C1-

Move beyond self-introduction into the C1 territory of values, behaviour and identity — articulating what you stand for and defending it under polite challenge.

Communicative goal: Articulate personal values, interpret human behaviour, and discuss identity with nuance across generations and cultures.

Learning outcomes

  • Use a wide range of evaluative and abstract vocabulary to describe values, motivations and personality.
  • Read and signal subtext, tone and implied attitude in others.
  • Adapt register from intimate to formal-public when discussing the self.
  • Defend a personal value position under polite challenge with hedged but firm stance.

Review Lab 1

Review Lab 1 — The Values Forum

Consolidate Lessons 01–05

A moderated panel where learners present and defend a personal value position, respond to challenge with diplomacy and summarise opposing views before responding.

Articulating valuesDiplomatic disagreementReading subtextRegister control

Unit 2 · Lessons 0610

Leadership, Influence & Professional Communication

Leading, influencing, operating with authority

CEFR C1

Move from participating in work to shaping it: leadership voice, influence without authority, decision-making meetings and high-stakes professional writing.

Communicative goal: Lead, influence and operate fluently in professional spoken and written genres; manage difficult workplace conversations.

Learning outcomes

  • Use nominalisation and impersonal structures for professional distance.
  • Influence across hierarchy without explicit authority.
  • Run a decision-making meeting and produce briefs, reports and high-stakes emails.
  • Deliver and receive critical feedback; refuse and escalate professionally.

Review Lab 2

Review Lab 2 — The Leadership Brief

Consolidate Lessons 06–10

Deliver a strategic recommendation to a panel, absorb hostile questioning and submit a written brief that synthesises the discussion.

Leadership voiceInfluenceChairingStrategic writing

Unit 3 · Lessons 1115

Global Mobility, Culture & Perspective

Living between cultures

CEFR C1

Beyond the travel phrasebook: pragmatic awareness across cultures, intercultural negotiation and mediation, lingua-franca clarity and global identity.

Communicative goal: Communicate across cultures with pragmatic awareness; negotiate and mediate between different communication norms.

Learning outcomes

  • Recognise and produce indirectness, hedging and high-/low-context styles.
  • Read silence, taboo and humour across cultures.
  • Negotiate and mediate when communication norms collide.
  • Discuss global identity, migration and belonging with nuance.

Review Lab 3

Review Lab 3 — The Cross-Border Negotiation

Consolidate Lessons 11–15

Simulate a partnership negotiation between two teams with different communication norms; mediate a breakdown and debrief on style and meaning.

Intercultural awarenessMediationNegotiationPragmatic reading

Unit 4 · Lessons 1620

Media, Narratives & Public Opinion

Deconstructing how stories shape us

CEFR C1

Move from reporting news to deconstructing framing, propaganda and platform discourse, then write and speak with stance.

Communicative goal: Deconstruct framing and propaganda; evaluate sources; write and speak with stance.

Learning outcomes

  • Identify framing, angle, omission and rhetorical strategy in real texts.
  • Evaluate evidence, source intent and bias with calibrated certainty.
  • Write op-ed-style opinion with balance and edge.
  • Discuss platform discourse and polarisation with critical vocabulary.

Review Lab 4

Review Lab 4 — The Editorial Desk

Consolidate Lessons 16–20

Take a contested story, write a 350-word op-ed, defend it at a simulated editorial meeting and revise in response to peer critique.

Critical analysisEvidence evaluationStance writingDefending an argument

Unit 5 · Lessons 2125

Mind, Wellbeing & Human Psychology

How we think, feel and decide

CEFR C1

Beyond symptoms and advice: cognitive bias, motivation, mental health discourse and the ethics of the wellness industry — discussed with diplomacy and evidence.

Communicative goal: Discuss psychology, mental health and wellbeing with diplomacy and evidence; evaluate contested wellbeing claims.

Learning outcomes

  • Use sensitive, non-stigmatising language in extended discussion.
  • Discuss cognitive bias, motivation and behaviour change with psychological vocabulary.
  • Evaluate evidence-based vs anecdotal claims.
  • Mediate disagreement on contested wellbeing topics.

Review Lab 5

Review Lab 5 — The Wellbeing Panel

Consolidate Lessons 21–25

Chair a panel debate on a contested wellbeing claim; mediate disagreement; summarise opposing positions for an audience.

Sensitive discussionMediationEvidence evaluationSummarising perspectives

Unit 6 · Lessons 2630

Society, Ethics & Global Challenges

Reasoning ethically about contested issues

CEFR C1

From opinion to ethical reasoning: principle vs consequence, trade-offs, steelmanning and moving deliberation toward decision.

Communicative goal: Reason ethically; weigh trade-offs; present balanced positions on contested public issues and move discussion toward decision.

Learning outcomes

  • Construct ethical arguments using principle, consequence and trade-off reasoning.
  • Steelman opposing views and concede strategically.
  • Discuss collective vs individual responsibility with nuance.
  • Synthesise debate into a defensible recommendation.

Review Lab 6

Review Lab 6 — The Citizens’ Assembly

Consolidate Lessons 26–30

Receive a wicked-problem brief, deliberate in small groups, reach a reasoned recommendation and present and defend it under questioning.

Ethical argumentSteelmanningSynthesisDeliberation

Unit 7 · Lessons 3135

Knowledge, Learning & Critical Thinking

How knowledge is made, defended and contested

CEFR C1+

From describing education to engaging critically with ideas and sources: synthesis, calibrated claims and substantive intellectual discussion.

Communicative goal: Engage critically with ideas and sources; synthesise multiple perspectives; calibrate claims; participate in substantive intellectual discussion.

Learning outcomes

  • Question assumptions and identify gaps in reasoning.
  • Synthesise multiple sources into a coherent position.
  • Hedge and qualify claims with precision.
  • Discuss expertise, intellectual humility and lifelong learning.

Review Lab 7

Review Lab 7 — The Ideas Exchange

Consolidate Lessons 31–35

Deliver an 8-minute TED-style talk on an idea, take Q&A and submit a 300-word companion piece in a real-world intellectual register.

SynthesisCalibrated claimsIdea presentationHandling Q&A

Unit 8 · Lessons 3640

Innovation, Technology & Ethics

Ethical reasoning about what tech makes possible

CEFR C1+

Beyond gadget chat: AI displacement, privacy, surveillance and pitching innovation under critical questioning.

Communicative goal: Speculate with ethical reasoning about technology; pitch ideas under critical questioning; weigh the consequences of innovation.

Learning outcomes

  • Speculate across time using a wide range of modal and conditional structures.
  • Argue ethical positions on AI, privacy and biotech.
  • Pitch a complex idea and defend it under hostile questioning.
  • Forecast with measured uncertainty, distinguishing prediction from advocacy.

Review Lab 8

Review Lab 8 — The Innovation Hearing

Consolidate Lessons 36–40

Pitch a technology to an ethics panel, absorb pointed questions and revise your proposal live in response.

Ethical speculationPitchingHandling hostile Q&APersuasion

Unit 9 · Lessons 4145

Culture, Creativity & Interpretation

Interpreting, arguing, writing about culture

CEFR C1+

Beyond like/dislike: interpretation, aesthetic argument, controversy and long-form critical writing in a rhetorical voice.

Communicative goal: Interpret cultural work with depth; argue aesthetic judgement; write and speak with rhetorical voice.

Learning outcomes

  • Move beyond like/dislike to interpretation and argument.
  • Use imagery, metaphor and parallelism in spoken and written argument.
  • Discuss censorship, controversy and the social role of art.
  • Write a long-form review or critical essay.

Review Lab 9

Review Lab 9 — The Cultural Review

Consolidate Lessons 41–45

Write a critical review of a chosen work, defend a controversial reading and chair a peer’s discussion of theirs.

InterpretationAesthetic argumentRhetorical writingChairing discussion

Unit 10 · Lessons 4650

Change, Influence & The Future

Integrated synthesis: stance, irony, public voice

CEFR C1+

Bring everything together: stance, qualification, irony and public-voice communication — the C1 finale and bridge to C2.

Communicative goal: Integrate everything from Units 1–9: speak with stance, irony and nuance; lead, persuade and reflect; bridge to C2.

Learning outcomes

  • Express stance, qualification, ambivalence and irony.
  • Speak on behalf of others in public-statement register.
  • Hold and communicate complexity without oversimplifying.
  • Reflect on personal C1 progress and identify gaps for C2.

Review Lab 10

Review Lab 10 — The Showcase

Consolidate Lessons 46–50

A final integrated assessment: a 10-minute talk on a chosen issue plus Q&A and a 400-word companion piece, drawing on at least four prior units and peer-evaluated against C1 descriptors.

SynthesisPublic voiceStance & nuanceReflection